Define: Hatch–Waxman Act

Hatch–Waxman Act
Hatch–Waxman Act
Quick Summary of Hatch–Waxman Act

The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, was enacted to increase the accessibility and affordability of generic drugs. Additionally, it provides a mechanism for drug companies to regain the time lost during the FDA approval process for their drug patents.

Full Definition Of Hatch–Waxman Act

The Hatch–Waxman Act, passed in 1984, is a federal law that offers incentives for the development of generic drugs. It allows drug-patent owners to recover the time lost on a patent’s term while waiting for approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For instance, if a drug company invests a significant amount of money in developing a new drug and obtains a patent, they are granted a specific period to exclusively sell the drug before other companies can produce generic versions. However, the FDA must approve the drug before it can be sold, which can be a lengthy process. Consequently, the drug company may lose some of the exclusive selling time. The Hatch–Waxman Act enables the drug company to regain the lost time on their patent. Additionally, the Act provides incentives for other companies to develop generic versions of drugs, ultimately making medications more affordable for those in need.

Hatch–Waxman Act FAQ'S

The Hatch-Waxman Act, officially known as the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, is a United States federal law enacted in 1984. It was designed to encourage the development of generic drugs while also protecting the interests of brand-name pharmaceutical companies.

The primary goal of the Hatch-Waxman Act is to strike a balance between promoting competition in the pharmaceutical industry and safeguarding the rights of patent holders. It aims to make affordable generic drugs available to consumers while providing incentives for innovation and research by brand-name drug manufacturers.

The Act provides a streamlined process for generic drug manufacturers to gain approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market their products. It allows them to rely on the safety and efficacy data of the brand-name drug, known as the reference listed drug (RLD), through an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) process.

Yes, the Act allows brand-name drug manufacturers to seek patent term extensions, known as “patent restoration,” to compensate for the time lost during the FDA approval process. This provides them with additional exclusivity beyond the original patent term.

The Act established a framework for resolving patent disputes through a legal process known as the Paragraph IV certification. Generic drug manufacturers can challenge the validity or infringement of the brand-name drug’s patents, triggering a patent infringement lawsuit.

The Act grants the first generic drug manufacturer to successfully challenge a brand-name drug’s patent with a Paragraph IV certification a 180-day exclusivity period. During this period, no other generic versions of the drug can enter the market, allowing the first generic manufacturer to enjoy a period of market exclusivity.

Brand-name drug manufacturers can file a lawsuit against generic drug manufacturers to enforce their patents. This can result in a court-ordered injunction, temporarily preventing the generic drug from entering the market until the patent dispute is resolved.

Yes, the Act includes a provision known as the “first filer” exclusivity. The first generic drug manufacturer to file an ANDA with a Paragraph IV certification is granted a period of exclusivity, even if other generic manufacturers subsequently challenge the same patent.

The Act’s provisions for generic drug entry into the market create competition, which often leads to lower drug prices. Generic drugs are generally more affordable than their brand-name counterparts, providing cost savings for consumers and healthcare systems.

As with any legislation, there are ongoing discussions and debates surrounding the Hatch-Waxman Act. Some stakeholders argue for reforms to address issues such as patent thickets, evergreening, and the abuse of the patent system. However, any proposed changes would require congressional action.

Related Phrases
No related content found.
Disclaimer

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/hatch%c2%96waxman-act/
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Hatch–Waxman Act. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/hatch%c2%96waxman-act/.
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Hatch–Waxman Act. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/hatch%c2%96waxman-act/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Hatch–Waxman Act. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/hatch%c2%96waxman-act/
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Divorce Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts